Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 07:29

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Why do very skinny girls get more male attention if it is true that men like curves?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Star-shaped brain cells may underpin the brain's massive memory storage - Live Science
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Royal Observatory Greenwich: The birthplace of modern astronomy turns 350 - Space
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How can I be okay with being ugly? What is the bright side?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do White people love dogs more than humans?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Mario Kart World Is Not An Open-World Game, Nintendo Says - GameSpot